On April 9, 2011, Professor Lawrence Krauss’ gave a talk titled, “Life, the Universe, and Nothing: A Cosmic Mystery Story.” Krauss’ work has been primarily in theoretical (as opposed to experimental) physics, and he has published research on a great variety of topics within that field. Krauss is a renowned cosmologist and popularizer of modern science and director of the Origins Project at Arizona State University. Hailed by Scientific American as a rare public intellectual, he is the author of more than three hundred scientific publications and 8 books, including the bestselling The Physics of Star Trek, and the recipient of numerous international awards for his research and writing. He is an internationally known theoretical physicist with wide research interests, including the interface between elementary particle physics and cosmology, where his studies include the early universe, the nature of dark matter, general relativity and neutrino astrophysics.
His soon to be published book, A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing is already garnering strong reviews. Exploring the scientific advances that provide insight into how the universe formed, Krauss ultimately tackles the age-old assumption that something cannot arise from nothing by arguing that not only can something arise from nothing, but something will always arise from nothing. One review of this book says:
Lawrence Krauss’s provocative answers to these and other timeless questions in a wildly popular lecture now on YouTube have attracted almost a million viewers. The last of these questions in particular has been at the center of religious and philosophical debates about the existence of God, and it’s the supposed counterargument to anyone who questions the need for God. As Krauss argues, scientists have, however, historically focused on other, more pressing issues—such as figuring out how the universe actually functions, which can ultimately help us to improve the quality of our lives.
– Amazon Book Review
Questions For Discussion:
One of the classic arguments for the existence of God is known as the “First Cause” argument. It works from the premise that in the universe every event is the effect of a cause. As a result, the events that caused today’s events must have had causes for themselves, and those causes in turn must have had their own causes, and so forth, creating a chain. Many religious proponents argue that First Cause is itself the strongest evidence for the existence of God. So do scientists, such as Stephen Hawking, who argue it is the laws of physics themselves brought the Universe into being, rather than God. What are your thoughts to this debate?
In what is now a classic debate, Christian apologist Dr. William Lane Craig recently debated Lawrence Krauss in North Carolina in an attempt to address the question: “Is there (sufficient) evidence for God? How does one try to prove their hypothesis against a belief? Is there evidence for God based on what we know about the universe?
In the past decade, there have been a number of best-selling books by proclaimed atheists and scientists regarding the existence of God. Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion), Christopher Hitchens (God Is Not Great), and Sam Harris (The End of Faith) all point out the flaws of religion and the harmful effects of it. Can religion be equated with God? Is religion the same as God?
One of the most prominent theologians of our time, Alister McGrath, once said “As a child I never had any interest in Christianity,’ he says. ‘I went through the motions of going to church with my parents but neither my heart nor my head was in it. It was while I was at the Methodist College, probably aged around 15 or 16, that I became an atheist – somebody who deliberately and intentionally does not believe in God and thinks that anyone who does believe in God is mentally deficient or seriously screwed up.” There are a number of famous theologians who had converted from atheism to being proponents of Christianity, such as C.S. Lewis. In your opinion, what does this say about religion, faith, and reason?
Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God is unknown or unknowable. Agnosticism is criticized from a variety of standpoints. Some religious thinkers see agnosticism as a limitation of the mind’s capacity. Some atheists criticize that agnosticism is indistinguishable from atheism. What are your thoughts about this issue? What do other world religions have to say about this argument?
What are some online webpages you think might be relevant to the topic of the science, the universe, and the question of God’s existence.
God vs. Science – http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1555132,00.html
Science Will Never Support Religion – http://bigthink.com/series/38/series_item/4523#player
Science vs Faith: Believe It or Not? – http://bigthink.com/ideas/20251
Lionel Tiger – Professor of Anthropology, Rutgers University on Science and God – http://bigthink.com/lioneltiger
What Resources and Books Might Be Useful for Follow-up Reading?
Science vs. religion: what scientists really think by Elaine Howard Ecklund. [UBC library online resource]
Based on a survey and interviews with scientists at more than 20 elite U.S. universities, Ecklund’s book argues that other scientists must step up to the table of dialogue and that American believers must embrace science again. Both science and religion are at stake if any less is done.
Universe or multiverse? edited by Bernard Carr [UBC Okangan Library QB981.U557 2007]
Recent developments in cosmology and particle physics, such as the string landscape picture, have led to the remarkable realization that our universe – rather than being unique – could be just one of many universes.
Cosmic beginnings and human ends: Where science and religion meet edited by Clifford N. Matthews, Roy Abraham Varghese [UBC Koerner Library BL241.C588 1995]
Science and religion meet in a fine series of statements by thinkers ranging from scientists to philosophers. This isn’t just a Christian collection: opinions range across and board and are based on a variety of beliefs; but all consider the basics of connections between science and religion; and all provide interesting reviews of human spiritual and scientific evolution.
Vancouver Institute lectures are free and open to the public. The Vancouver Institute was established in 1916 to serve as a liaison between “town and gown” in providing lectures of general public interest. For more information about the Vancouver Institute, please visit its homepage at http://vaninst.ca
For more information, please contact Allan Cho